Site Map
- Index
- Gregory Sidak
- Expertise
- Publications
- Articles
- A FRAND Contract’s Intended Third-Party Beneficiary
- Tournaments and FRAND Royalties
- The Value of a Standard Versus the Value of Standardization
- Evading Portfolio Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents Through Validity Challenges
- Ongoing Royalties for Patent Infringement
- Comments of Amici Curiae J. Gregory Sidak & Jeremy O. Skog in Support of Neither Party in Response to the Board’s Request for Additional Briefing Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(d)
- Maximizing the U.S. Postal Service’s Profits from Competitive Products
- Apportionment, FRAND Royalties, and Comparable Licenses After Ericsson v. D-Link
- Brief for Amici Curiae J. Gregory Sidak, Robert D. Willig, David J. Teece, and Keith N. Hylton Scholars and Experts in Antitrust Economics in Support of Defendants-Appellants and Supporting Reversal
- Comments on the Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Antimonopoly Act (Draft)
- Attack of the Shorting Bass: Does the Inter Partes Review Process Enable Petitioners to Earn Abnormal Returns?
- Comments on the Updated Draft Version of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines
- Reply of J. Gregory Sidak, Chairman, Criterion Economics, to the Written Submission of Chairwoman Edith Ramirez of the Federal Trade Commission on the Public Interest
- How Licensing a Portfolio of Standard-Essential Patents Is Like Buying a Car
- Bargaining Power and Patent Damages
- Two Economic Rationales for Felony Murder
- FRAND in India: The Delhi High Court’s Emerging Jurisprudence on Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents
- The Antitrust Division’s Devaluation of Standard-Essential Patents
- Did Asymmetric Mobile Termination Rates Help Entrants Gain Market Share?
- Did Separating Openreach from British Telecom Benefit Consumers?
- Do Free Mobile Apps Harm Consumers?
- The Meaning of FRAND, Part II: Injunctions
- Proposed IEEE Bylaw Amendments Affecting FRAND Licensing of SEPs
- The Proper Royalty Base for Patent Damages
- Mandating Final-Offer Arbitration of FRAND Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents
- Submission of Comments of J. Gregory Sidak Regarding Fair, Reasonable, and Nondiscriminatory Royalties and Injunctions for Standard-Essential Patents
- The Meaning of FRAND, Part I: Royalties
- Court-Appointed Neutral Economic Experts
- Is Harm Ever Irreparable?
- Holdup, Royalty Stacking, and the Presumption of Injunctive Relief for Patent Infringement: A Reply to Lemley and Shapiro
- Patent Damages and Real Options: How Judicial Characterization of Non-Infringing Alternatives Reduces Incentives to Innovate
- Remedies and the Institutional Design of Regulation in Network Industries
- Antitrust Divestiture in Network Industries
- Antitrust Preliminary Injunctions in Hostile Tender Offers
- The Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Enforcement
- Rethinking Antitrust Damages
- The Cost of Antitrust Deterrence: Why Not Hang a Price Fixer Now and Then?
- The Misuse of Profit Margins to Infer Market Power
- The Use of Proportional Market Shares as Estimates of Diversion Ratios in Merger Analysis
- What Does the Chicago School Teach About Internet Search and the Antitrust Treatment of Google?
- The OECD’s Proposal to Cartelize Mexican Telecommunications
- How Does the Experience of U.S. Telecommunications Regulation Inform the Forced Sharing of Intellectual Property Rights under Global Competition Law?
- Declaration of Economists and Antitrust Scholars on Behalf of Radiomóvil Dipsa S.A. de C.V (Telcel)
- Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law
- Rewriting the Horizontal Merger Guidelines in the Name of Dynamic Competition
- Google and the Proper Antitrust Scrutiny of Orphan Books
- Patent Holdup and Oligopsonistic Collusion in Standard-Setting Organizations
- Evaluating Market Power with Two-Sided Demand and Preemptive Offers to Dissipate Monopoly Rent: Lessons for High-Technology Industries from the Antitrust Division’s Approval of the XM-Sirius Satellite
- Abolishing the Price Squeeze as a Theory of Antitrust Liability
- Brief of Amici Curiae Professors and Scholars in Law and Economics in Support of the Petitioners, Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc.
- Should Antitrust Consent Decrees Regulate Post-Merger Pricing?
- The Future of the Postal Monopoly: American and European Perspectives After the Presidential Commission and Flamingo Industries
- European and American Approaches to Antitrust Remedies and the Institutional Design of Regulation in Telecommunications
- Competition Law for State-Owned Enterprises
- Incentives for Anticompetitive Behavior by Public Enterprises
- Is Structural Separation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Necessary for Competition?
- Does Bell Company Entry into Long-Distance Telecommunications Benefit Consumers?
- Capital Subsidies, Profit Maximization, and Acquisitions by Partially Privatized Telecommunications Carriers
- Acquisitions by Partially Privatized Firms: The Case of Deutsche Telekom and Voicestream
- An Antitrust Rule for Software Integration
- Are Public Enterprises the Only Credible Predators?
- A General Framework for Competitive Analysis in Wireless Telecommunications
- Essential Facilities
- Monopoly and the Mandate of Canada Post
- Competition and Regulatory Policies for Interactive Broadband Networks
- Debunking Predatory Innovation
- The Fallacy of “Equal Treatment” in Brazil’s Bill of Rights for Internet Users
- The Impact of Multisided Markets on the Debate over Optional Transactions for Enhanced Delivery over the Internet
- Innovation Spillovers and the “Dirt Road” Fallacy: The Intellectual Bankruptcy of Banning Optional Transactions for Enhanced Delivery Over the Internet
- Are Regulators Forward-Looking? The Market Price of Copper Versus the Regulated Price of Mandatory Access to Unbundled Local Loops in Telecommunications Networks
- What Is the Network Neutrality Debate Really About?
- Vertical Foreclosure in Video Programming Markets: Implications for Cable Operators
- When Does an Optional Tariff Not Lead to a Pareto Improvement? The Ambiguous Effects of Self-Selecting Nonlinear Pricing When Demand Is Interdependent or Firms Do Not Maximize Profit
- A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Network Neutrality Regulation of the Internet
- Net Neutrality: Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate
- Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries
- Should Regulators Set Rates to Terminate Calls on Mobile Networks?
- Uberregulation Without Economics: The World Trade Organization’s Decision in the U.S.-Mexico Arbitration on Telecommunications Services
- Do States Tax Wireless Services Inefficiently? Evidence on the Price Elasticity of Demand
- Why Do the Poor and the Less-Educated Pay More for Long-Distance Calls?
- An Economic Theory of Censorship
- Mandatory Unbundling, UNE-P, and the Cost of Equity: Does TELRIC Pricing Increase Risk for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers?
- The Failure of Good Intentions: The WorldCom Fraud and the Collapse of American Telecommunications After Deregulation
- Interim Pricing of Local Loop Unbundling in Ireland: Epilogue
- Exporting Telecommunications Regulation: The U.S.-Japan Negotiations on Interconnection Pricing
- How Can Regulators Set Nonarbitrary Interim Rates? The Case of Local Loop Unbundling in Ireland
- The Empirical Case Against Asymmetric Regulation of Broadband Internet Access
- Why Did the U.S. Telecommunications Industry Collapse?
- Residential Demand for Broadband Telecommunications and Consumer Access to Unaffiliated Internet Content Providers
- Innovation, Investment, and Unbundling
- A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Mandatory Unbundling of Telecommunications Networks
- Deregulation and Managed Competition in Network Industries
- Cyberjam: The Law and Economics of Internet Congestion of the Telephone Network
- Network Access Pricing and Deregulation
- The Tragedy of the Telecommons: Government Pricing of Unbundled Network Elements Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996
- Deregulatory Takings and Breach of the Regulatory Contract
- The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors
- Telecommunications in Jericho
- The “New Payola” and the American Record Industry: Transactions Costs and Precautionary Ignorance in Contracts for Illicit Services
- The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?
- The Efficient Allocation of Proceeds from a Utility’s Sale of Assets
- Stranded Costs
- Takeover Premiums, Appraisal Rights and the Price Elasticity of a Firm’s Publicly Traded Stock
- Corporate Takeovers, the Commerce Clause, and the Efficient Anonymity of Shareholders
- What Is Wrong with American Telecommunications?
- Givings, Takings, and the Fallacy of Forward-Looking Costs
- Video Games: Serious Business for America's Economy
- Antitrust and the IEEE’s Bylaw Amendments
- The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors: Rejoinder and Epilogue
- The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors
- How Relevant Is Justice Cardozo's “Book of Wisdom” to Patent Damages?
- Comments on the Revised Draft Amendments to the Patent Law
- Comments on the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines on the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights
- Evaluating Market Power Using Competitive Benchmark Prices Instead of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
- Economists as Arbitrators
- Injunctive Relief and the FRAND Commitment in the United States
- Does the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Violate Due Process as Applied?
- Brief of Leading Economists as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents
- Using Conjoint Analysis to Apportion Patent Damages
- Addendum to Attack of the Shorting Bass: Does the Inter Partes Review Process Enable Petitioners to Earn Abnormal Returns?
- FRAND in India
- Memorandum on Standard-Essential Patents
- International Trade Commission Exclusion Orders for the Infringement of Standard-Essential Patents
- Abolishing the Letter-Box Monopoly
- Testing for Bias to Suppress Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents
- Is Uber Unconstitutional?
- Does the International Trade Commission Facilitate Patent Holdup?
- International Settlement Rates and U.S. Exportation of “Procompetitive Deregulatory Principles” After the WTO Agreement on Telecommunications Services
- What Aggregate Royalty Do Manufacturers of Mobile Phones Pay to License Standard-Essential Patents?
- Converting Royalty Payment Structures for Patent Licenses
- Competition in Colombian Telecommunications
- Two-Sided Market Definition and Competitive Effects for Credit Cards After United States v. American Express
- Enhanced Damages for Infringement of Standard-Essential Patents
- How Commissioner Vestager’s Mistaken Views on Standard-Essential Patents Illustrate Why President Trump Needs a Unified Policy on Antitrust and Innovation
- Irreparable Harm from Patent Infringement
- Is Harm Ever Irreparable?
- The Tempting of American Antitrust Law: An Open Letter to President Trump
- Protecting Competition from the Postal Monopoly
- TCPA Declaration in Support of Quicken Loan's Motion to Deny Class Certification
- Is a FRAND Royalty a Point or a Range?
- Using Regression Analysis of Observed Licenses to Calculate a Reasonable Royalty for Patent Infringement
- Fair and Unfair Discrimination in Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents Encumbered by a FRAND or RAND Commitment
- Hedonic Prices and Patent Royalties
- EquitiesFirst
- Comments on the Japan Guidelines for Licensing Negotiations Involving Standard-Essential Patents
- Cable Modems and DSL: Broadband Internet Access for Residential Customers
- Does Video Delivered Over a Telephone Network Require a Cable Franchise?
- Brief for Amici Curiae J. Gregory Sidak and Robert D. Willig in Support of Respondents
- Brief for Amicus Curiae J. Gregory Sidak in Support of Petitioner
- The FRAND Contract
- Making the Postal Service Great Again
- Citation Weighting, Patent Ranking, and Apportionment of Value for Standard-Essential Patents
- Will the CJEU's Decision in MEO Change FRAND Disputes Globally?
- Brief Amici Curiae of 37 Economists, Antitrust Scholars, and Former Government Antitrust Officials in Support of Appellees and Supporting Affirmance
- Is Patent Holdup a Hoax?
- Is Professor Salop Right That Judge Leon Bungled United States v. AT&T?
- Why Unwired Planet Might Revolutionize the Resolution of FRAND Licensing Disputes
- Brief for Amici Curiae 37 Economists, Antitrust Scholars, and Former Government Antitrust Officials in Support of Appellees and Supporting Affirmance
- Memorandum: Will the International Trade Commission or the Antitrust Division Set Policy on Monopoly and Innovation?
- Letter from Judge Ken Starr to Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim Concerning Conflict Between the International Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division Over Monopoly and Innovation
- Judge Selna’s Errors in TCL v. Ericsson Concerning Apportionment, Nondiscrimination, and Royalties Under the FRAND Contract
- Hedonic Prices for Multicomponent Products
- Hedonic Prices and Patent Royalties: Epilogue
- Proposed Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Guidelines on the Repeal of Subsection 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
- Misconceptions Concerning the Use of Hedonic Prices to Determine FRAND or RAND Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents
- Transition Bonds for Stranded Costs
- What Makes FRAND Fair? The Just Price, Contract Formation, and the Division of Surplus from Voluntary Exchange
- Capitalism, Socialism, and the Constitution
- Negotiating FRAND Licenses in Good Faith
- An Economic Theory of Censorship Revisited
- The Legislator-in-Chief
- Mr. Justice Nemo's Social Statics
- True God of the Next Justice
- The Petty Larceny of the Police Power
- The Line-Item Veto Amendment
- The Quasi War Cases—and Their Relevance to Whether
- The Price of Experience: The Constitution After September 11, 2001
- Why Did President Bush Repudiate the “Inherent” Line-Item Veto?
- War, Liberty, and Enemy Aliens
- The Inverse Coase Theorem and Declarations of War
- To Declare War
- The President's Power of the Purse
- Four Faces of the Item Veto: A Reply to Tribe and Kurland
- The Recommendation Clause
- Why Should the Postal Service Deter Amazon’s Competitive Entry into Last-Mile Parcel Delivery?
- Monopoly, Innovation, and Due Process: FTC v. Qualcomm and the Imperative to Destroy
- How the COVID-19 Pandemic Accelerated the Transformation of the U.S. Postal Service into a State-Owned Package-Delivery Enterprise—and Why Policymakers Must Respond
- The Pig in the Python Revisited: Is Lumpy Capital Investment Used and Useful?
- The Law of n+1
- Brief of Amicus Curiae J. Gregory Sidak in Support of Appellees
- Brief of J. Gregory Sidak and David J. Teece as Amici Curiae in Support of Facebook
- The Fair Division of Surplus from a FRAND License Negotiated in Good Faith
- EquitiesFirst
- Contact Us
- Disclaimer
- Privacy Policy
- Select Media
Criterion Economics, Inc. Home