Geistiges Eigentum

Mandating Final-Offer Arbitration of FRAND Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents (Criterion Economics working paper, June 16, 2014).

Submission of Comments of J. Gregory Sidak Regarding Fair, Reasonable, and Nondiscriminatory Royalties and Injunctions for Standard-Essential Patents, Chiteki Zaisan Kōtō Saibansho [Intellectual Property High Court of Japan], Case 2013 (ne) no. 10043 (filed Mar. 24, 2014).

The Meaning of FRAND, Part I: Royalties, 9 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 931 (2013).

Court-Appointed Neutral Economic Experts, 9 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 359 (2013).

Apple v. Motorola: Implications for Patent Damages, Law360 (June 29, 2012).

How Does the Experience of U.S. Telecommunications Regulation Inform the Forced Sharing of Intellectual Property Rights Under Global Competition Law?, Criterion Economics Working Paper (2012).

Is Harm Ever Irreparable?, Inaugural Address for the Ronald Coase Professorship of Law and Economics, Tilburg University (Sept. 16, 2011).

Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law, 5 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 581 (2009).

Google and the Proper Antitrust Scrutiny of Orphan Books, 5 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 411 (2009).

Patent Holdup and Oligopsonistic Collusion in Standard Setting Organizations, 5 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 123 (2009).

Holdup, Royalty Stacking, and the Presumption of Injunctive Relief for Patent Infringement: A Reply to Lemley and Shapiro, 92 Minnesota Law Review 713 (2008).

Patent Damages and Real Options: How Judicial Characterization of Non-Infringing Alternatives Reduces Incentives to Innovate, 22 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 825 (2007).